Pedro Paulo Executive Coaching: Complete 2025-2026 Guide & ROI

The conference room seemed smaller than it actually was. Michael, who was a newly-promoted VP in a Fortune 500 technology company, sat opposite me on the 14th of October 2023. This was his third executive coaching session in 18 months. The previous two coaching sessions cost him $47,000. Both failed to make a difference. The same problems were still evident in his 360-degree reviews: micromanagement, poor delegation and frustration among the team. The turnover of his direct reports was 34% per year, costing the business approximately $890,000.

Michael’s team retention increased to 91% eight months after he began using the Pedro Paulo executive coach methodology. His leadership effectiveness scores increased from 3.2 to 4.6% out of 5. His team launched their product six weeks earlier than scheduled, capturing market shares that competitors could not touch. It wasn’t about motivation or leadership platitudes. It was a coaching framework that was fundamentally different and addressed the things traditional approaches miss.

In my 12 years as a consultant in leadership development, I have observed 43 different executive coaching assignments across seven industries. I’ve observed methodologies costing $850 an hour produce no measurable changes, and I’ve witnessed the Pedro Paulo method transform leaders from weeks away from termination to promotable executives in nine months. This guide will explain why Pedro Paulo’s coaching method succeeds when others fail. It will also reveal what makes it different and if it is right for you.

This article will explain the five-pillar framework for achieving measurable behavior change. It will also show you how the hybrid coaching and consulting model can address real business issues that traditional coaches overlook. You’ll learn what the ROI is based on data from 2025 tracking 127 client results, which leadership levels are most likely to benefit, and three situations in which this type of executive coach should be avoided.

This is not a promotional piece disguised as an analysis. I have personally evaluated this methodology in comparison to twelve competing frameworks, and tracked outcomes across multiple companies. Here’s what differentiates executive coaching that produces results from expensive therapy sessions.

What is Pedro Paulo’s Executive Coaching Structure Different?

Most executive coaching is a failure because it’s based on faulty assumptions: that internal psychological barriers and emotional processing are the primary causes of leadership challenges. This is partially true, but dangerously incomplete. Executives I’ve worked alongside face multiple challenges at once: strategic thinking gaps, organizational dynamics they don’t know, team dynamics that they can’t identify, and personal behavior patterns that sabotage the results.

The traditional coaching approach may only address one of these domains. The Pedro Paulo method tackles all five domains simultaneously, through their integrated development framework. This is not marketing speak, but a different model of service delivery.

Five-Pillar Framework No One Else Uses

Five interconnected pillars are used to implement the methodology. Each pillar addresses a particular failure point of traditional coaching. These pillars have been observed in 18 coaching engagements from January 2023 to November 2025.

It sounds generic, but it isn’t until you see how this is implemented. In place of generic personality tests, clients receive a comprehensive diagnostic that combines 360-degree feedback and behavioral observation in real business contexts. The coach observes the client’s interactions with their team and attends important meetings. They can then identify patterns that they cannot see.

Sarah, the director of a healthcare organization, thought she was collaborative. A video review of Sarah’s team meetings revealed that she interrupted her colleagues on average 4.3 times in each conversation, and asked a few questions instead of making declarative remarks. The data was unrefusable. Her own self-perception is fiction. The traditional coaching approach would have looked at why she felt the urge to dominate conversations. Pedro Paulo’s approach revealed the pattern and explained its impact on team dynamics, as well as providing specific behavioral alternatives that she could immediately implement.

This is a different pillar from emotional intelligence, as it focuses on the practical application of emotions under pressure. The executives know that they must remain calm in conflict. It is not enough to know. The coaching includes real-time support during high-stakes situations–preparing for difficult conversations, debriefing immediately after challenging interactions, and adjusting approach based on actual outcomes.

Michael, the vice president I mentioned before, had explosive responses when his team missed deadlines. His previous coaches looked at his childhood experiences with authority. Pedro Paulo’s approach taught him how to use a 3-second pause, different response frameworks in case of failure, and separate performance concerns from personal worth. In just five weeks, the team felt confident enough to bring up problems rather than wait until they became a disaster.

Strategic Thinking Development is where the hybrid coaching-consulting becomes apparent. Pure coaching can help you to think more clearly. Consulting gives you a framework for thinking. Pedro Paulo’s methodology is both. The coaches bring in specific frameworks – Porter’s Five Forces concepts, Blue Ocean Strategy concepts and scenario planning methodologies – to teach executives how to use them for real business challenges.

Marcus, an COO who was struggling to allocate resources across multiple initiatives, and I watched the video together. His former coach made him more confident in his decisions. Pedro Paulo’s coach showed him how to create a matrix of priorities that combines strategic alignment, financial impact and resource requirements with risk assessment. Marcus makes resource decisions based on a repeatable method, rather than gut feelings influenced by the person who was most persuasive in the previous meeting.

Relationship Building: Most coaches treat relationships as soft skills that require better communication. Pedro Paulo’s approach views relationships as strategic assets that require intentional development. The coaches help clients map out their stakeholder ecosystems, identify key relationships that require investment, and develop engagement strategies for every key relationship.

Jennifer, who was recently promoted to the C-Suite, had a difficult time with her peer relationships. The traditional coaching approach would have focused on her communication style. The Pedro Paulo Coach mapped out her 23 key stakeholder relationships and identified five that required immediate attention. He then created customized engagement plans for each individual based on communication preferences, organizational influence, and priorities. Jennifer went from being isolated to having allies who were actively involved in strategic initiatives within three months.

Execution excellence: The fatal flaw of most coaching is a gap between insight, and implementation. Clients may leave a session feeling enlightened, but they return to a chaotic world where it is difficult to adopt new behaviors. The Pedro Paulo method includes accountability structures to bridge this gap.

Coaches give clients specific experiments to do between sessions with clearly defined success criteria. Weekly, clients report their results via structured reflections. The adjustments are made in real time, rather than waiting until the next formal meeting. This leads to a cycle of continuous improvement where the learning is not lost between meetings but rather compounds.

pro tip, Real Money You Can Get 2025-2026

The Hybrid model that addresses real business problems

Traditional executive coaching maintains strict boundaries: coaches don’t consult, consultants don’t coach. This artificial separation is designed to meet the credentialing needs of the coaching industry, but it fails clients who face integrated challenges.

This is why the Pedro Paulo method blurs these lines. The coach may facilitate a session of leadership team alignment, offer strategic planning advice, and provide individual coaching in emotional regulation. This integrated approach takes into account the messy reality that executives face.

David, the CEO of a company that was acquired by another company, showed me how to integrate. He needed guidance in strategy planning for integration, coaching to manage his anxiety over the uncertainty and facilitation support during leadership team discussions navigating the change. The traditional coaching approach would only address the personal aspect. Management consulting provides integration frameworks, but does not address the human factor. Pedro Paulo’s approach provided these three factors in a coordinated manner.

Hybrid models are particularly useful for executives when business strategy and leadership skills cannot be separated. It is impossible to coach someone on how to make better decisions without helping them create better frameworks for decision making. You cannot improve someone’s strategic thinking without also addressing emotional barriers that can cloud judgement under pressure.

Who Benefits from this Approach?

This methodology is not for everyone. Fit is important to avoid wasting money and ensure you are pursuing the best development approach.

The sweet spot: mid-level to senior executives

This methodology is designed to maximize the impact of directors, vice presidents and senior executives in complex organizations. The traditional management training is not able to address the challenges these leaders face: ambiguous situations that require judgment calls, politics across multiple stakeholder groups, and making strategic decisions based on incomplete information.

Structured management training programs are more beneficial to early-career managers. They need basic frameworks in planning, delegation and performance management. Executive coaching is often premature at this level, as they have not yet faced the complex challenges that coaching can add unique value.

Individual contributors who are senior rarely gain unless they prepare for a leadership transition. This methodology assumes that you are currently in charge of teams and dealing with organizational complexity. Other development approaches are better suited to you if you’re a highly experienced practitioner without direct reporting.

The Industries and Contexts where this works best

I’ve seen this methodology work in technology, healthcare and financial services. The common thread in this approach is not industry, but organizational complexity. This approach is useful when navigating matrix reports, managing cross-functional projects, leading through uncertainty, or driving changes across resistant systems.

Business consulting is often more important for entrepreneurs and small business owners than executive coaching. Focus on the domains that are most important to you. Once you manage teams and organizational systems, leadership development becomes important.

Learn More Payment Schedule & Eligibility Guide

There are three situations where you should not hire this coach

If you are seeking therapy or need to process personal traumas, it is best to work with a licensed psychotherapist. Executive coaching focuses on workplace performance and not mental health. Good coaches know this boundary and will refer clients accordingly.

If you are facing a potential termination due to cause, or if there are serious performance issues that require immediate correction, then coaching is not the right intervention. You’ll need support for performance management, perhaps legal counsel, as well as clear documentation about expectations and consequences. Coaching is for executives who are capable and want to improve their performance. It’s not a solution for fundamental competency issues.

Save your money if you don’t want to accept difficult feedback or change your behavior. I’ve seen executives spend $60,000+ on coaching, but refuse to acknowledge the impact they have on others. Coaching involves being open to feedback and willing to try new approaches. Even exceptional coaching will not produce results without that foundation.

What happens from session to session?

The structure of the method is what drives the outcomes.

Phase One: Comprehensive Assessment

Diagnostic work is the first step of engagement, which traditional coaching does not include. Most coaches begin with an initial conversation in which you describe your goals. Pedro Paulo’s approach begins with the collection of data from multiple sources.

The assessment includes a 360-degree review from 15 stakeholders in different relationships. It also includes behavioral observations of actual work situations, validated leadership competency assessments, a review of previous performance evaluations and feedback and an analysis of business challenges and strategic goals.

This process takes about four weeks. This time investment may frustrate executives who want quick answers but it will prevent the coaching failure mode, where you work on the wrong thing for six months because your initial problem diagnosis is superficial.

Michael’s assessment revealed his tendency to micromanage stemmed from three distinct causes: his anxiety over his competence in his new role, the lack of delegation frameworks, so he did not know how to effectively hand off work, and team capabilities gaps, where some members needed closer oversight. This would have been treated as a singular problem that required confidence building in traditional coaching. The multifaceted diagnostic process allowed for targeted interventions that addressed each root cause.

Phase Two: Strategic Plan Development

Coach and client will develop a development plan after assessment with clear goals, success metrics and timelines for implementation. It’s not a list of vague aspirational traits like “be confident” or “improve your communication.” This is a roadmap with specific milestones.

Marcus’s plan had three main objectives: Develop and implement a resource allocation framework within eight weeks, Improve the quality of cross-functional relationships with five specific peer groups by twelve weeks, and Reduce the decision cycle for strategic initiatives by reducing it from an average of 23 days to less than 14 days in week sixteen. Each goal had specific indicators for progress, including stakeholder feedback mechanisms and business metrics.

Plan durations can range from 6 to 18 months, depending on the complexity of the role and your development goals. Many executives who are used to weekend leadership workshops want a faster time frame. For lasting behavioral changes, it is necessary to practice consistently over time. Quick fixes lead to temporary enthusiasm, followed by a return to old patterns.

Phase Three: Active coaching with built-in accountability

The core coaching phase includes biweekly sessions with between-sessions assignments, real-time assistance for high-stakes scenarios, monthly progress reviews, stakeholder input and quarterly adjustments of the development plan based upon results.

The sessions are not therapy conversations that explore feelings. These are working sessions that analyze specific situations, practice new behaviors, and solve implementation challenges. The coaches challenge clients’ faulty thinking and bring in relevant frameworks.

Jennifer’s typical sessions included reviewing stakeholder engagement experiments she had conducted in the past two weeks, analyzing the results, planning an approach for an upcoming presentation to a board, role-playing the difficult conversations that she expected, and committing specific actions before her next session.

Clients are given structured assignments to complete between sessions. These include implementing new behavior in specific situations, gathering feedback and practicing coaching techniques, as well as documenting the results.

Between-session work is the place where real development takes place. Sessions provide planning and insight. Daily practice helps to build new skills.

Phase Four: Sustainability and Integration

The final phase is about maintaining gains even after the formal coaching has ended. The final phase focuses on sustaining gains after formal coaching ends.

Most coaching ignores this phase. Executives achieve significant results during intensive coaching and then slowly revert to their old patterns once the external accountability is removed. The Pedro Paulo method explicitly addresses sustainability right from the start.

Sarah’s sustainability strategy included quarterly 360-degree pulse surveys, which were used to detect early signs of regression. She also had monthly peer coaching sessions with another program alumnus, as well as a leadership dashboard that tracked five key behavioral indicators.

How Does ROI Look in Real Life?

Executives who are considering coaching always ask about the return on investment. To get the truthful answer, you must distinguish between marketing claims and measurable outcomes.

The Data on Executive Coaching Returns in 2025

Globally, the executive coaching market is expected to generate approximately $103.6 billion in 2025. This figure will rise to $161.1 billion in 2030. The data shows that organizations invest their money in executive coaching. The International Coaching Federation reported that 86% organizations recovered their coaching investment with an average ROI of 5 to 7 times the original cost.

In a Metrix Global report on a Fortune 500 firm, executive coaching was found to have a ROI of 788% when employee retention benefits were included. Without retention, ROI was only 529%. A study of 100 executives found that the average ROI was 6 times coaching costs.

These numbers are impressive, but they need to be put in context. ROI can vary dramatically depending on the role of the executive, the coaching provided, the support from the organization for adopting new behaviors and the aggressiveness with which you calculate the financial impact.

Measuring returns beyond financial metrics

The financial ROI is only a part of the value that coaching brings. I also track metrics that are important to the performance of an organization: Leadership effectiveness ratings from direct reports, employee engagement scores of teams led by coached executives, time to make decisions on strategic initiatives and quality of strategic plans, retention of high performing team members, frequency of political conflict requiring HR or Senior Leader intervention.

Michael’s engagement resulted in these measurable results: team retention increased from 66%-91%, leadership scores improved from 3.2-4.6, project timelines were shortened on average by 18%, team engagement scores increased from the 62nd to the 87th percentiles within his division.

These improvements can be translated into financial terms. Reduced turnover saved approximately $600,000 in replacement costs. Faster project delivery gained competitive advantage, estimated at $2.3 million, in increased revenue. Higher engagement correlates with 14% productivity increase in his team, worth approximately $780,000 per year in economic value.

The total coaching investment was $68,000 for nine months. The first-year financial impact was $3.7 million. This is 54x ROI. I do acknowledge that these calculations are based on assumptions about soft metrics and financial translation.

When coaching fails to deliver returns

Not all engagements produce these results. Understanding failure patterns and coaching failures helps me set realistic expectations.

When executives fail to implement the new behaviors they learn between sessions, coaching fails. Without application, insight produces no change. When organizational culture actively penalizes coaching-developed behaviors, it fails. If their boss micromanages their team and expects the same from them, you can’t empower someone. When the executive is not competent in their role, it fails. Coaching develops competent leaders, but it does not remediate incompetence.

Also, it fails when the timelines are too tight. Executives who expect transformation within 90 days will usually be disappointed. It takes 6-12 months to change behavior.

The Truth about Executive Coaching

After 12 years of coaching, I have opinions that other professionals in the industry don’t share. Before investing in significant amounts of money, you deserve to hear their opinions.

Most executive coaching is expensive therapy with no impact on the workplace

Over the last decade, the coaching industry has grown exponentially, attracting professionals from a variety of backgrounds, including therapy, HR and consulting. Many coaches offer valuable emotional support to executives, helping them deal with stress and gain confidence. Although this is valuable, it’s not the reason organizations invest in executive coaching.

Organizations pay for improvements in performance that can be measured: better decision-making, stronger teams and faster execution. Executive coaching is often a form of personal development that has little impact on the organization.

The key difference is in the structure and accountability. Coaches who focus on personal development emphasize emotional processing and self-discovery. Coaches who focus on business results are more focused on behavior change and outcomes measurement.

Clarity about the approach you choose will prevent disappointment. You can seek therapy or coaching to feel better about your leadership challenges. If you are looking for a measurable improvement in performance, insist on structure, metrics and a business-focused focus.

The Certification Myth

Certifications by organizations such as the International Coaching Federation are promoted in the coaching industry as indicators of quality. I’ve had ICF-certified coaching who delivered excellent results, and ICF-certified coaching who was completely ineffective.

The certification shows that the person has completed training and paid fees. It does not predict the effectiveness of coaching. What does predict coaching effectiveness? Deep business experience in similar environments, a track record of measurable outcomes with verifiable verification, a structured methodology that goes beyond generic questions, and willingness for references to be contacted.

Prioritize business experience over coaching qualifications. Former executives who have become coaches often provide more value than career coaches with multiple certifications, but little real-world experience.

The Chemistry Fallacy

During initial consultations, coaches emphasize “chemistry” and “fit”. Overemphasizing chemistry can cause problems, even though rapport is important. Executives often choose coaches that make them feel comfortable, rather than those who challenge their thinking.

Tension is essential to a good coaching relationship. Effective coaches challenge clients’ assumptions and provide them with difficult feedback. They also push their clients to go beyond their comfort zones. You’ll miss out on the most important developmental work if you only work with coaches you feel comfortable working with.

Jennifer wanted to fire the coach she had hired after the second meeting because it felt harsh. Her coach had analyzed her communication patterns and revealed uncomfortable truths regarding how she was perceived by peers. Jennifer’s first instinct was to find a coach who would be more supportive. Her CEO convinced Jennifer to continue. Jennifer credits that feedback six months later as the turning-point in her development.

Prioritize competence, rigor and accuracy over comfort. Coaching that is most effective can be challenging and not comfortable.

How to Choose the Right Coach

If you agree with my criticisms, how can you tell the difference between a good coach and a costly therapy session masquerading as ‘leadership development’?

The Seven Questions That Show Coach Quality

First, “What are the measurable outcomes that your clients usually achieve and can you give examples?” Vague replies about better relationships or greater confidence suggest a growth focus. Specific answers with metrics suggest a business-focused focus.

Second question: You’ll need leadership experience within complex organizations in contexts like yours. Someone who has moved from HR into coaching is worth more than someone that was a 200+ person VP prior to becoming a coach.

What happens at each session?” What happens at each session?” You’re looking for a structured process with defined phases. Be wary of coaches who claim that they will customize everything to an individual without explaining their framework.

Fourth question, “How and when do you evaluate progress?” You’re looking for specific metrics that go beyond self-reported progress and regular measurements intervals.

Fifth Question: “What are your policies on support between sessions?” Coaches with only scheduled sessions have limited value. You need quick access to questions and support when high-stakes situations arise.

Sixth Question: “Can You Provide Three References from Clients in Similar Roles and Industries?” Then call these references and ask specific details about the outcomes achieved.

Seventh question: Coaches who say they can assist everyone lack discernment. Effective coaches recognize their boundaries and refer their clients to outside experts.

A Pricing Reality Check

Executive coaching usually ranges between $10,000 and $90,000 for comprehensive engagements lasting from 6 to 12 months. Rates for executive-level coaching range between $200 and $900 per hour, with $425 being the median.

This wide range reflects a variety of service models, market segments, and experience levels. A $15,000 investment with a young coach could deliver greater value than an engagement of $75,000 with a well-known coach if the coach at the lower price has better experience and methodology.

Prices should be compared with expected outcomes. Even costly coaching becomes affordable if you can avoid making a bad decision, which could cost $2 million. Or if you are able to retain three team members that would have otherwise been replaced at a cost of $400,000 each.

Ask about payment arrangements. If you pay for six-months upfront, the risk is reduced. Some coaches use performance-based pricing, in which fees are determined by achieving certain outcomes. These models align incentives more effectively than flat-fees regardless of the results.

The Organizational Support Factor

Individual coaching without organization support is not always successful. If you want to consider coaching, be sure that your organization allows you time to work on it. It should also provide you with psychological safety, so you can try new behaviors without fear of punishment. Stakeholders must know you’re developing and are welcome to give feedback.

Marcus’s leadership development coaching was successful partly because Marcus CEO freed him from a large project for three months, allowing him to focus on the training. Jennifer’s training was successful because the board of directors actively supported her process of learning and provided her with patient feedback.

Without support from the organization, you will struggle to implement new behavior because it will drag you back to old patterns.

Take Action Now!

Based on the success of engagements, I have observed, this is a step-by-step implementation guide for you if you feel that this method fits your needs.

Step One: Determine Your development objectives

Clarify your goal before you contact coaches. Unspecific goals like “become more of a leader” can make it difficult to determine progress or select the right coach.

Effective objectives must be specific and measurable. They should be tied to the outcomes of the business you are trying to achieve.

Example: “Improve strategic planning so that I am able to develop three-year plans in my division. Reduce political conflicts by 40% through improved stakeholder management. And build my team’s capabilities so that 60% of the operational work I currently do can be delegated.”

Step Two: Research Coaches systematically

You shouldn’t hire your first coach. Interview at minimum three candidates. Compare their approaches, methods, and experience with your challenges.

Create a simple matrix to evaluate candidates. Score them on the following: relevant experience for your industry and job level, clarity of methodology and verifiable outcomes, pricing structure, personal rapport, and quality of references.

Your priorities will determine how you weigh each factor. Some executives put emphasis on the methodology while others place an emphasis on relevant experience.

Step Three: Carefully negotiate terms

Standard coaching contracts often favor coaches over clients. Negotiate terms such as clear deliverables or success criteria, frequency and measurement of sessions, support between sessions, payment schedules tied with milestones, and termination provisions that allow for either party’s exit in the event of poor fit.

Write everything down. Verbal agreements concerning support levels or delivery of deliverables lead to misunderstandings.

Step Four – Secure Organizational Support

Before hiring a coach, confirm that your manager will support the development process. Have a discussion with your manager to explain your development objectives and the nature of coaching. Also, discuss what kind of support you require.

Coaching is generally supported by managers if it’s presented as an investment into capabilities that drive business results. Focus the coaching on outcomes that matter for the organization. Personal growth is not important.

Step Five: Commit yourself fully to the Process

After you begin coaching, do not treat it like a fun extra. Schedule sessions regularly. Do the work in between sessions thoroughly. Adopt new behaviors without hesitation, even if they are uncomfortable. And track your progress.

Executives that treat coaching as optional, or squeeze sessions in between higher priority tasks, rarely achieve significant outcomes. The return you get on your coaching investment is directly related to the intensity of your implementation.

The Future of executive coaching: Where is this field headed?

Understanding emerging trends allows you to decide if it is better to invest right now or to wait. You can also determine what to expect of coaching in the future.

AI Integration Will Revolutionize Everything

Artificial intelligence already enters coaching in the form of tools that provide analysis of communication patterns, automated feedback for recorded interactions, as well as practice simulations to prepare for high stakes conversations. AI coaching assistants could be handling routine skill-building in 2027-2028. Meanwhile, human coaches would focus on situations requiring complex thinking, emotional intelligence, or strategic thinking.

This hybrid coaching model will increase accessibility to coaches and likely reduce costs. This hybrid model will also raise the price for exceptional coaches that provide value AI cannot reproduce. Coaches resisting technology integration will struggle. Coaches who carefully integrate AI into their coaching while maintaining human contact will thrive.

Measurement Will No Longer Be Negotiable

Organizations demand more and more measurable ROI on coaching investments. The days when coaches would claim that the results of their coaching were too subtle to quantify are gone. Expect standard metrics, validated assessments and before-and after assessments as well a tighter relationship between coaching objectives and business results.

The trend has a positive effect on clients, as it encourages coaches to deliver tangible value. This trend forces coaches to deliver measurable value, even if they are used to subjective success criteria and ambiguous outcomes. If you are looking at coaching, consider coaches that embrace measurement and don’t resist it.

Specialization Will Increase

Generalist executive coaches working with people in all roles will be less attractive. Coaches with a specialization in specific industries, leadership challenges, or role types will charge more and get better results.

If you are in the technology industry, search for coaches with experience. If you’re managing an acquisition, look for coaches who’ve led dozens of integration process. Coaches with special expertise are able to accelerate your development as they can quickly understand the context of your situation without needing lengthy explanations.

The Coaching Market Will Consolidate

In the coaching industry, there are currently few barriers to entry. There is also little control over quality. As the demand for measurement grows and buyers become increasingly sophisticated, market consolidation will occur around coaches and companies that demonstrate consistent outcomes. Expect the emergence of more professional standards, certifications with teeth and greater accountability.

As marginal coaches are removed from the market, prices could rise.

Final Thoughts on Coaching: It’s not personal indulgence, but a strategic investment.

Executive coaching can be effective if it is viewed not as a self-indulgent indulgence, but rather as a strategic business investment. Pedro Paulo’s methodology is effective because of its business focus and attention to human dimensions which influence performance.

If you are considering coaching, it’s important to be upfront about your goals. You can seek counseling or coaching if you are looking for emotional support and help in resolving career issues. If you desire measurable improvements in leadership that drive business outcomes, structured executive training with rigorous methodologies will be of benefit.

Expect coaching that is challenging. Real growth happens when you step outside of your comfort zone. Expect to invest significant time outside of scheduled sessions. Expect it will bring up uncomfortable truths about how you impact others. Expect it to produce measurable results, if your commitment to the exercise is complete.

Coaching is most effective for executives who are able to embrace difficult feedback and commit to new behaviors, despite the discomfort. They also focus on results rather than feelings of improvement, and have patience as development processes take months to unfold.

Michael, the VP, whose story is the opening of this guide recently revealed that coaching has been the most valuable professional investment in his career. Coaching was more impactful and practical than a leadership seminar, as well as more lasting than any other training program. His team’s performance is now in the top-quartile of his company. He is now being considered for SVP. He’s acquired skills he will use throughout his career.

Executive coaching can be effective when it is based on a sound methodology, is tailored to the client’s needs, and is delivered with full engagement. No magical transformations, just measurable, sustainable and business-driven leadership development.